Search for: "Warner Express, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
In one case, a frequent statistician testifier for the lawsuit industry, Martin Wells, expressed the opinion that the study at issue in the litigation “was seriously flawed by bad epidemiological practice. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm by Thomas James
Statute of Limitations and Damages Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
The most famous decision might be the UK Supreme Court’s Ruling in Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd, which was reported on this blog here. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am by Robert B. Milligan
Fresh Express, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-05611-PJH, 2020 WL 513287 (N.D. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am by Editor Charlie
Before the United States Copyright Royalty JudgesCopyright Royalty Board Library of Congress Docket No. 21–CRB–0001–PR               (2023–2027) COMMENTS OF HELIENNE LINDVALL, DAVID LOWERY AND BLAKE MORGAN             Helienne Lindvall, David Lowery and Blake Morgan submit these comments responding to the Copyright Royalty Judges’… [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Newsweek LLC, 464 F.Supp.3d 594 (SDNY 2020). [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
["Publicly expressing anger toward an elected official is not a basis for entry of an injunction. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:12 am by Stan Gibson and Jessica Newman
Mar. 25, 2013). [4] Id. [5] Warner Brothers Pictures Inc., 197 Cal.App.2d 331. [6] See, e.g., Jegen v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:27 am by Eugene Volokh
" SJW Levels of Awareness begins with Hughes expressing her excitement over the potential election of a female president, followed by a clip depicting her subsequent disappointment over Secretary Clinton's loss. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:18 am by Ben
 The Kluwer Copyright Blog has more on the decision by Mr Justice Birss in Warner Music & another v TuneIn Inc [2019] EWHC 2923 (ch). [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 8:27 am by Jonathan Bailey
To that end, the judge has now ruled that such a block does not infringe upon net neutrality or freedom of expression. [read post]