Search for: "Warner v. Arnold"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
Author AcdxSource WikipediaCreative Commons Licence Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Warner-Lambert Company LLC [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (13 Oct 2016) This was an appeal against Mr Justice Arnold's judgment in Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Warner-Lambert Company LLC [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat) which I discussed in The Pregabalin Trial: Generics (UK) Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:02 am
In Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF and Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) (21 Jan 2015) Warner-Lambert LLC applied to Mr Justice Arnold for an interim injunction in the following terms: "1, The Defendants: (a) shall make it a condition of any oral or written agreement entered into with a pharmacy for the supply of Lecaent that the pharmacy shall use reasonable [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 5:27 am
The Internet MessengerAuthor Buky Schwartz Licence CC BY-2,5 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Sir Geoffrey Vos MR, Lady Justice Rose and Lord Justice Arnold) Warner Music UK Ltd and others v TuneIn Inc, [2021] EWCA Civ 441 (26 March 2021)This was an appeal by Tunein Inc. against Mr Justice Birss judgment in Warner Music UK Ltd and others v TuneIn Inc [2019] EWHC 2923 (Ch) ( [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
As a brief refresher, in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) Arnold J construed the Swiss form claim as requiring the infringer (for example a generic producer) to “subjectively intend” the medicine to be used for the patented indication. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 3:41 pm
This blogpost reported the Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:55 am
The full citation is Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015).Rather than reproduce earlier posts, the IPKat would refer readers who are new to this saga to his earlier posts, hereand here.That this Order was made was intriguing to this moggy. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
This Kat posted last month on the fascinating case of Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat), in which Arnold J gave the first detailed UK consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
In a decision that is only moderately Arnoldian (139 paragraphs), Mr Justice Arnold refused today to grant an interim injunction that Warner Lambert had requested against Actavis [Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) (21 January 2015)]. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:47 am
Notably, Mr Justice Arnold considered the principles of insufficiency established by Warner-Lambert v Actavis applicable, even though the use of the antibody to treat psoriasis was a first medical use. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am
In Sandoz v BMS, Arnold LJ considered G 2/21 in the context of the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications… [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:40 am
Arnold J held that for an infringing act to occur, Warner-Lambert had to show that the manufacturer intended to supply the medication for Patented Indications. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
Mr Justice Arnold was doubtful of this "since the skilled person is located in the UK" (Generics v Warner Lambert, [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat)) (para. 118). [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
This is referred to in [145] of the latest judgment, and this Kat, hoping for news of the appeal, was disappointed - Arnold J reports "I do not know when the appeals from Warner-Lambert V will be heard, and in particular whether they will be expedited by the Court of Appeal". [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Steven Willis (Bristows) reports: "Since that first rapid response seminar, Arnold J has issued a further judgment concerning Warner-Lambert’s right to amend the Patent after the trial and whether that amounted to an abuse of process (Generics (UK) t/a Mylan v Warner-Lambert [2015] EWHC 3370 (Pat)). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am
Prior to Sandoz I, Arnold J had held a number of claims of Warner-Lambert’s patent for the use of pregabalin in pain invalid including claim 1 (pain) and claim 3 (neuropathic pain) (“Warner-Lambert V” according to Arnold J’s nomenclature). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
The main claim at issue is a Swiss form claim, and although this is significant for the present case, much less turns on it than in the other saga ongoing at the moment of Warner Lambert v Actavis (latest instalment here). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
While this moggy was struggling to get back from Indonesia, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in the pregabalin appeal Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (13 October 2016), and finally the IPKat has managed to blog about it (the lateness by no means reflecting on the importance of the judgment).It is very much a judgment of three halves.In the first part of the judgment (up to [135]), which substantively… [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
In Regeneron v Kymab (IPKat post here), a patent was found enabled and thus sufficiently disclosed despite the example methods provided in the specification being unworkable at the time of the invention. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
Over to Katie, Rachel and Claire: "Last week, the UK Supreme Court held a 4-day hearing in Warner-Lambert v Actavis et al., the latest (perhaps last?) [read post]
