Search for: "Warner v. Arnold"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2016, 4:58 am
The trade association, which represents the three major recorded music labels, Universal, Sony and Warner as well as many independent labels, sent its first takedown request to Google in July 2011. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
This is referred to in [145] of the latest judgment, and this Kat, hoping for news of the appeal, was disappointed - Arnold J reports "I do not know when the appeals from Warner-Lambert V will be heard, and in particular whether they will be expedited by the Court of Appeal". [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
No need for Pregabalin(e) injunction, say the FrenchAfter Jeremy's post on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, here, Katfriend Grégoire Triet (Avocat au Barreau de Paris and a partner… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:41 pm
Now Warner Lambert applied to continue those injunctions either until trial or until a further order.Mr Justice Arnold granted the injunction. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
The patent belongs Warner-Lambert, a company that was acquired by Pfizer in 2000. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 63 [week ending on Sunday 13 September] - Fair compensation in reprography and private copying: the ECS’ version | Substitute sellers | Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma | Evidence-based IP policy | KitKat case | UK IPO’s priorities | UK IPO’s website vs complete copyright legislation | Patent Attorney Qualifications | Mylan and Actavis v… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
Darren tells all.* BREAKING NEWS Full decision out in the Lyrica case, and it's a whopperDarren breaks the news of the issuance of Mr Justice Arnold's first instance judgement following the full trial in the long-running case of Mylan and Actavis v Warner-Lambert (case management decision here, Court of Appeal decision here and here, and four first instance decisions here, here, here and here).* The debate… [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:32 am
Incidentally, the 81,423-wordjudgment does not contain the W word ...There has just fallen onto the desk of this Kat the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold at first instance following the full trial in the long-running case of Mylan and Actavis v Warner-Lambert. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
The main claim at issue is a Swiss form claim, and although this is significant for the present case, much less turns on it than in the other saga ongoing at the moment of Warner Lambert v Actavis (latest instalment here). [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
Wathelet gives Nestlé application a bit of stickCJEU’s Advocate General Wathelet delivered his Opinion in the keenly-awaited dispute in Case C‑215/14Société des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd, a reference from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales [noted by the IPKat here and here]. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications… [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
* Warner-Lambert v Actavis; the Court of Appeal has its say on second medical use claims in the UKIPKat readers who have followed this saga will know that, earlier this year, Mr Justice Arnold gave the first detailed consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means [see blog posts here and here]. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
’To avoid infringement of the Swiss claim no onewas told which drug was being manufacturedIn January in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) Mr Justice Arnold said the Swiss style claim requires the infringer to ‘subjectively intend’ that the medicament will be used for the relevant condition. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
As a brief refresher, in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) Arnold J construed the Swiss form claim as requiring the infringer (for example a generic producer) to “subjectively intend” the medicine to be used for the patented indication. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In this respect this Kat has pondered whether Mr Justice Arnold’s decision Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) is a good one in respect of the interpretation of Swiss style claims (Katpost here). [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:38 am
Patentees can no longer take for granted profits made during the term of interim injunctive relief, irrespective of the outcome of the substantive claim.More generally, as regards the availability of interim relief against generic pharmaceutical companies where an invention is claimed in Swiss form, the outcome of the appeal of Arnold J's decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) is awaited with interest.Many thanks to both Paul and Ailsa for both the… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
Eleonora and Hugo Cuddigan QC attended a lively discussion chaired by the Hon Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
