Search for: "Warner v. State " Results 201 - 220 of 1,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm by Gordon Firemark
Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode: William Faulkner’s suit against Sony Pictures and Woody Allen; Warner Brothers has won an important victory in the Superman litigation, Albert Einstein’s likeness is now in the public domain, and a group representing talent managers is suing California officials over the state’s licensing statute for agents and much more… HOSTS Gordon Firemark Website: http://firemark.com… [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
Justices Leave Door Open to Discovery Rule Copyright Damages — Bloomberg Law’s Kyle Jahner writes about yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
Preemption is a big deal: The feds have tried to preempt state regulation of financial markets, as in Watters v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:48 pm
 The Court distinguished the setback limitations at issue in Hoffman from the operational requirements at issue in Warner Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:14 pm by John Collins
On 14 November 2018, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Warner-Lambert Company LLC (Appellant) v Generics (UK) Ltd t/a Mylan and another (Respondents) [2018] UKSC 56. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Alford and Brooks Foland of the Camp Hill, PA office of Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants illegally intercepted and broadcast the Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr. v. [read post]