Search for: "Warner v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
By Nina Rice* The history of New York’s statutory law pertaining to the art market is relatively brief despite the state’s long held status as the art capital of the United States, if not the world. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:23 pm by Scott M. Pearson
Democratic Senator Mark Warner has introduced a bill, S.1642, that would override the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by Bexis
United States, 132 S.Ct. 2492 (2012), and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978),[1] much like FOIA requesters need have no particular reason to obtain government records. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
In 2010, it sued in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging unauthorized interception and broadcast of the December 2007 "Undefeated" match between Floyd Mayweather and Ricky Hatton. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
Infringement of Claim 3 The  focus of the infringement ruling is Claim 3, stating  --“use of pregabalin for the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for treating neuropathic pain”.The claim in question is a purpose-limited process claim. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm by NARF
Perez (Cultural Resources; Native American Graves Protection Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Matter of Welfare of Children A.J.J. ( Indian Child Welfare Act; Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act) In re M. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:58 am by Mark Litwak
In return, the United States protects the work of French authors in the United States.This means that the United States will protect a French author in the United States in the same manner and extent as the United States protects American authors. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
   Each of those pre-1923 works is now in the public domain in the United States. [read post]