Search for: "Warren v. Hart" Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
But it is an open question whether the transferor might still be secondarily liable (see, eg, Paul S Davies Accessory Liability (Hart Publishing, 2017) chapter 6). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am by Ken Kersch
Theory Three: The Warren Court/Hart & Sacks Whipsaw To me, historically speaking, this theory is the most interesting. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In today’s column, I criticize its reliance on the views of liberal scholars.In a single paragraph, Justice Alito cites John Hart Ely, Archibald Cox, Laurence Tribe, Mark Tushnet, Philip Bobbitt, and Akhil Amar for the proposition that the reasoning of Roe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:53 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: K579.L5 L39 2015Kit Barker, Ross Grantham & Warren Swain, eds., The Law of Misstatements: 50 Years on from Hedley Byrne v Heller (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015). [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
  For example, as John Hart Ely famously argued, much of the Warren Court's work was representation-reinforcing, trying to correct breakdowns in the political process. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
Posted by Ric Marshall, MSCI Inc., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:29 am
Rev. 55 (1963). 16 446 John Hart Ely, The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:25 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
It may have been the lawyers – Abe Fortas and John Hart Ely representing Gideon and J. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The theory is only partly descriptive, however, as Ely used it not only to praise Warren Court decisions but also to criticize rulings (especially Roe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  John Hart Ely’s theory of judicial review as serving the end of reinforcing the representative nature of American government is a descriptive theory of the work of the Warren Court. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm by Erin Miller
Much of the Supreme Court’s moral capital rests on two Warren Court decisions, Brown v. [read post]