Search for: "Washington Road Developers, LLC v. Weeks" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (Patently-O) Tafas v Kappos – CAFC dismisses Tafas suit against Rules; leaves lower court ruling in tact (Patent Baristas) (Patently-O) (Patent Docs) (America-Israel Patent Law)… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Sand Hill Advisors, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Due diligence matters: E D Washington decision in Pacific Coast Trailers, LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper)… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
When an LLC that owned the development borrowed money from the bank, it required the wives of the owners to sign the loan agreement, agreeing to be “primarily and unconditionally liable” for the debt, so the bank could pursue them first, before pursuing the LLC’s owners. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC overturns final judgment in Google’s favour in case brought by Leo Stoller who seeks to have Google’s trade mark declared generic: (IP Law360), (Trademark Blog), European Parliament says ‘no’ to disconnecting P2P users: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Intellectual Property… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent … [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office)   Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46)   Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango)   Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition… [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 9 July 2019 Sharp P and Warby J handed down judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Yaxley-Lennon [2019] EWHC 1791 (QB). [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC again affirms invalidation of claims to 'means'-defined elements involving a computer algorithm as indefinite: Net MoneyIN v Verisign (IP Updates) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (PLI) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) District Court: Patent term adjustments just got longer: Wyeth v… [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
In what is shaping up to be a developed versus developing country slugfest of words, developing countries have released a draft of their own. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On 3 February 2023, judgment was handed down in the Supreme Court of South Australia in Duffy v Google LLC [2023] SASC 13. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Washington Post – Eli Rosenberg | Published: 11/2/2019 The road to the presidential nomination next year is sure to be full of unforeseen twists and potholes as a crowded field of Democratic contenders dukes it out in a volatile political climate. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, David Levine and Thomas Kearns discuss the court’s decision in Midland Funding, LLC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
” But what distinguishes these ten weeks of video from United States v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
Northstar Spectrum, LLC), we see that Jeff Lamken argued against Seth Waxman, and that other legal heavyweights were on the respective briefs. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Piritek (UK) v Robert Jackson [2018] EWHC 2030 (QB), Nicklin J imposed a 20 weeks’ sentence suspended for the period of two years against a defendant who, in continually breaching an injunction restraining him from publishing defamatory remarks about the Claimant, was found in contempt of court. [read post]