Search for: "Washington v Paris"
Results 1 - 20
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
On March 5, 2024, in recognition of the 25th anniversary of the Washington Conference, 15 best practices were released in order to improve the practical implementation of the Washington Principles. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:05 am
For its part, V-Dem considers Kosovo an “electoral democracy” vs. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:21 am
Carême v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
In 2002, in Ashcroft v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Some reports have said the perpetrator in Paris swore allegiance to the self-styled Islamic state militant group. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 am
Menzel v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
If question I is answered to the affirmativeCan a party B validly rely on the priority right claimed in a PCT-application for the purpose of claiming priority rights under Article 87(1) EPCin the case where1) a PCT-application designates party A as applicant for the US only and party B as applicant for other designated States, including regional European patent protection and2) the PCT-application claims priority from an earlier patent application that designates party A as the applicant and3) the… [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Since the BP v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brown argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in International Shoe v Washington, the proper test of jurisdiction is whether the corporation satisfies the minimum contact test. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:11 pm
Part V explains the relevance of the consistent approaches and argues that ICSID tribunals have established a jurisprudence constante in dealing with SCEs that confirms their access as claimants in investor-state disputes. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Is the Paris Agreement likely to change this? [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:04 pm
The parties’ actual anticipated length of stay in Washington, D.C., was unclear. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
Kaplan (Port Washington), Alessandra Biaggi ((Bronx/Westchester), Simcha Felder (NY Senate District 22), and Mike Martucci (NY Senate District 42) to investigate ways to improve Holocaust awareness, leading to the creation and passage of the amendment to New York State Education Law § 233-aa.[12] NYS Museums, as educational institutions that to a significant extent protect cultural heritage and share history with the public, have the educational responsibility to disclose histories of… [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:12 am
The University of Washington’s own Professor Eric Schnapper is involved in the Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
Google on February 21 in Washington, DC. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 6:18 pm
Cat Zakrzewski and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post report that “Supreme Court hears a case that could transform the internet; Oral arguments begin in Gonzalez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 8:32 am
Next month the question of whether Section 230 should protect platforms when they make targeted recommendations of information, or only protect platforms when they engage in traditional editorial functions like publishing or withdrawing content, will be raised in front of the Supreme Court by University of Washington Law Professor Eric Schnapper in Gonzalez v. [read post]
