Search for: "Washington v. The Boeing Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2016, 8:55 am
Boeing Company - 5/5/16. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 11:16 am
In the case of Walston v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:37 pm
Boeing Co., a former Boeing employee brought a claim under the Washington Family Leave Act, alleging that Boeing could not require an employee to to notify his manager in addition to requesting leave through a company hotline. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:13 am
Gorena v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:13 am
Gorena v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:31 am
The NLRB filed a lawsuit in April 2011, against Boeing, claiming that the company’s decision to open a Dreamliner production line in South Carolina was in retaliation against The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers for a series of union strikes that reportedly slowed production of the plane in 2008 in Washington State. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:32 am
The Seventh Circuit affirmed several district court orders remanding a purported mass action removed to federal court by Boeing Company in Koral v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:56 am
However, where the employee failed to show that his neck injury was a “substantial factor” in Boeing’s decision to terminate his employment, his discrimination and failure-to-accommodate claims under the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD) failed to survive (Jury v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:03 am
” The NLRB filed a lawsuit in April 2011, against Boeing, claiming that the company’s decision to open a Dreamliner production line in South Carolina was in retaliation against The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers for a series of union strikes that reportedly slowed production of the plane in 2008 in Washington State. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
” The NLRB filed a lawsuit in April 2011, against Boeing, claiming that the company’s decision to open a Dreamliner production line in South Carolina was in retaliation against The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers for a series of union strikes that reportedly slowed production of the plane in 2008 in Washington State. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:45 am
Recent patent applications assigned to Boeing show the company’s desire to create more adaptive in-flight management in response to unforeseen conditions. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:21 am
Denying her summary judgment motion in whole and Boeing’s motion in part, the court found that fact questions existed as to whether the company’s placement of the employee on unpaid leave showed a discriminatory animus, as to why it revoked an internal job offer while she was on leave, and as to whether Boeing’s claim that it terminated her because of her disruptive behavior rather than her disability was pretextual (Huge v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:12 am
The court in Tides v The Boeing Co., --- F.4th ---- (9th Cir. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:55 am
Boeing Co. did not waive attorney-client privilege by holding group deposition preparation meetings between company counsel and current employees and a former employee, a federal district court in Washington has ruled, denying an employee’s motion to compel discovery (Pallies v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:53 am
U.S., 09-1298, and Boeing v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 8:32 am
The Boeing Company – United States District Court – Western District of Washington – October 11, 2022) involves a breach of contract claim. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:38 am
District Court for the Western District of Washington granted Boeing’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:06 am
The Boeing Company, 1-13-cv-00874 (ILND August 15, 2013, Order) (Darrah, J.). [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:48 pm
In Tides v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:48 pm
In Tides v. [read post]
