Search for: "Waterford v. Mcdonald"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2014, 11:42 am
In McDonald v Asset Acceptance it was held that a third party debt buyer (Asset Acceptance and Cavalry are very similar in this respect) may not charge interest for the period of time post charge off. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
