Search for: "Waters v. University of SC" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 11:32 pm
On 7 May 2014, a constitution bench of the SC rendered judgment in Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 9:38 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In fact, this parity between an interim award and a final award may be discerned by referring to the SC’s decision in McDermott International Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Water takes the shape of whatever is holding it at the time and although water can be so gentle, it’s also the most powerful and malleable force in the universe. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:09 pm by The Legal Blog
Bungo Steel Furniture (P) Ltd. (1967) 1 SCR 324 : AIR 1967 SC 1032 may be seen as also the decision in Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott &amp; Kindermann
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
Federal-Mogul Corporation (Docket Report) Siemens – Rotary clubbed: Siemens hit with water filter patent suit: Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) &nbsp; Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith &amp; Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith &amp; Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode)   Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:10 am
 Insurance Corporation of British Columbia  (1990)  44 BCLR (2d) 303 (SC) and  Shea  v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:10 am by The Legal Blog
Delhi Development Authority, AIR 1996 SC 253 the Supreme Court disapproved of the conversion of an area meant for a park for the use of a school. [read post]