Search for: "Watkins v. Washington"
Results 101 - 120
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army – More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright – Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in ‘Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea’ and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border… [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:19 pm
The ability now of states to prosecute national banks for consumer compliance violations means they also can go after issues of safety and soundness, says former OCC Chief Counsel Brian Smith, now a partner with Latham & Watkins in Washington, D.C. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 1:09 pm
Bell of Latham & Watkins in Washington — argued that Iqbal did not change the law, and did not aler the Twombly rule on plausibility requirements. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Ed. at 1045-47 (holding state could not criminalize teaching of German language to pupils who had not yet passed eighth grade); Watkins v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP) New Zealand Haka war dance now covered by intellectual property (Techdirt) Nigeria Nigerian musicians want payment for music played on airplanes (Afro-IP) Poland PARIS-DAKAR seeks to invalidate world trade mark registration for DAKAR by Polish company by the same name (Class 46) South Africa Delays at the SA registry favour trade mark proprietor: Golden Fried Chicken (Pty) Ltd v Soulsa CC (Afro-IP) Spain Exhaustion of trade… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 26, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cop's race/failure-to-promote suit>> Noted here: SJ-R.com>> EEOC v Watkins Motor Lines, No. 08-2483 (7th Cir. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
E. coli bacteria: what are they, where did they come from, and why are some so dangerous? [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for New York: UCP of Greater Suffolk 250 Marcus Boulevard Hauppauge, NY 11788 Phone: (631) 232-0011 Fax: (631) 232-4422 E-mail: info@ucp-suffolk.org Web: http://www.ucp-suffolk.org 159 Indian Head Road Commack, NY 11725 Phone: (631) 543-4500 Fax: (631) 543-5162 51-33 Terryville Road Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 Phone: (631) 474-5100 Fax: (631) 474-5100 9 Smiths Lane Commack, NY 11725 Phone: (631) 543-2338 Fax: (631) 543-5162 48 Jagger Lane… [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:05 am
Bush and Al Odah v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 11:28 am
Watkins v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 12:37 am
In the 1961 decision in Torcaso v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:00 am
The officers' had the requisite "well founded suspicion" under Washington law based on a report from a neighbor. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:55 pm
Taking on the issues Wednesday will be Maureen Mahoney of Latham & Watkins in Washington, D.C., speaking for the Tennessee association; she will yield part of her time to Dan Himmelfarb, an assistant to the U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Clark Martin, who retired from Vinson & Elkins on Jan. 1, says among those planning to join Kelly Hart as Houston partners are two V&E partners who are close to that firm's mandatory retirement age of 67, and former Enron Corp. general counsel James V. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 4:09 pm
Watkins, 335 U.S. 160. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
Mahoney of Latham & Watkins, LLP will argue the case for the petitioner. [read post]
