Search for: "Watson v. Georgia"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
Watson, Jr., Professor of Law, at the Harvard Law School. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
” Watson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
For the Georgia case’s purposes, the most relevant is Supremacy Clause immunity. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
SEC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
Georgia, 22-721Issue: Whether the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits a second prosecution for a crime of which a defendant was previously acquitted. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Watson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 1:35 pm
Watson v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Part IV examines the three major state supreme court cases involving Bowie knives: In Georgia, Nunn v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 7:24 am
Similarly, when chief executives of Atlanta-based Delta Air Lines and Coca-Cola forcefully condemned Georgia passing a restrictive voting bill[xiii] no adverse action was taken. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
Watson (Georgia), Sonja R. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 11:16 am
Watson (Georgia), Sonja R. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Table 1: Selected County and Municipal Rental Car Excise Taxes State Locality Car Rental Excise Tax Funding Purpose Alaska Anchorage 8% City general fund Arizona Maricopa County (Phoenix) The greater of 3.25% or $2.50 per rental Glendale Stadium; youth & amateur sports Arizona Pima County (Tucson) $3.50 Kino Sports Complex Colorado Denver 7.25% Colorado Convention Center Georgia Atlanta 10% State Farm Arena Illinois Chicago 6% and 9% transaction tax (a) City general fund Indiana… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Watson (Georgia), Sonja R. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
Georgia In New Georgia Project v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
See, e.g., Watson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
See, e.g., Watson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
” It was assumed that such adaptation would invoke Article V at the national level. [read post]
