Search for: "Watson v. Little et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 6:04 am
Gabet et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
In a recent NBER report by David Altig et. al., researchers found that by earning an extra $1,000, one in four of the poorest households, regardless of age, gives half to two-thirds of their paycheck to the government in taxes due to marginal net tax rates above 70 percent on earned income.[1] This has significant implications for work incentives and tax credit eligibility if filers combine their incomes and continue working. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
See, e.g., Watson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
See, e.g., Watson v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as the framework through which collectives (the state, the… [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:00 pm
Tom Watson et al., which respectively considered Swedish and U.K. laws mandating that communications service providers retain customer communications data in bulk for the purpose of preventing and detecting serious crime. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
Later in the Opinion, the Advocate General also dismissed the suggestion that Digital Rights Ireland did not apply because the regime in issue in Watson et al was a national regime and not one established by the EU legislature. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Mr Oettinger seemingly agreed as he had previously expressed his preference for "uniform rules" on copyright to apply across the European Union.In February, Swedish songwriters joined their UK counterparts in criticising the way in which revenues from the digital streaming pie are currently shared out, pointing out the unfair and unsustainable way in which royalties stemming from streaming services are being shared between different stakeholders - in particular the large share taken… [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 4:21 am
William Watson, Cato, more, yet more, related] Courts come down hard on copyright troll Prenda Law [Popehat] Annals of patent trollery: New York Times et al rout Helferich [EFF, Liquid Litigation BLLawg] Monolithic Power Systems v. 02 Micros [IP for the Little Guy] Resistance by Newegg, RackSpace, Hyundai, etc. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
King-Vassel et al., 2012 U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
In Watson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
More compensation may only seem fair for individuals who have put time and effort away from their daily living activities to contribute to a cause through which every other class member may be enriched with little effort especially where the compensation is small.[8] On the other hand, another question that must be addressed is why the RP should get more compensation in Cy-près distributions where no one in the class would get any pay out for example. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Viacom v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
” Id. at 6 (quoting Dukes, et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Nike, Inc. et al. [read post]
Law Review: Met Gate / Hackgate – whatever you call it – The Coulson story isn’t going to go away…..
6 Sep 2010, 8:52 pm
[Scotland Yard is examining new information according to the latest reports] *** A bit of SPIN Drying for you – I don’t suppose that anti Murdoch feeling (Wall Street Journal v New York Times and The Times / Sky et al versus The Guardian has anything whatsoever to do with the prominence of this story – how would I know? [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
SOMA ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
Watson, 2006 BCSC 53, 21 E.T.R. (3d) 285; P.S.G. v G.G. [read post]
