Search for: "Watson v. Poore" Results 41 - 57 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: CAFC denies outsourcing of inventorship to foreign countries: Solvay v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:54 am by Steve Hall
"The state corrective process as a whole was ineffective," Brandt said.The opinion in Balentine v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
Watson, 2006 BCSC 53, 21 E.T.R. (3d) 285; P.S.G. v G.G. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:45 am by James Bickford
Watson countered that the case was correctly decided, insufficiently important to merit certiorari, and a poor vehicle for deciding the question presented. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
Watson Docket: 08-6261 Argument date: Will be set for argument in March or April 2010 Question presented: A person who violates a court order can be held in contempt, which can be civil (requiring payment of a fine, for example) or criminal (potentially requiring jail time). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
(IPKat) HIV/AIDS treatment access policies: Emerging incentives for pro-poor changes to IP? [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US: Gene patenting debate continues: UCLA v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (PatentlyBIOtech) (Patent Docs) (IP Watchdog) US: FTC issues highly anticipated report on follow-on biologics; report concludes that special legislative exclusivity incentives are largely unwarranted for innovators and generics (FDA Law Blog) (Patent Docs)… [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US: Gene patenting debate continues: UCLA v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (PatentlyBIOtech) (Patent Docs) (IP Watchdog) US: FTC issues highly anticipated report on follow-on biologics; report concludes that special legislative exclusivity incentives are largely unwarranted for innovators and generics (FDA Law Blog) (Patent Docs) (Patent… [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 8:17 am
On December 19th, we wrote an article about a poorly decided California Supreme Court decision, Van Horn v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:27 pm
After studying thousands of broken bats and hundreds that shattered into multiple pieces, the committee concluded the cause was the poor-quality “slope of grain” and ruptures caused by excessive bending. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz), US: Proposals for the approval of generic biologics under consideration: (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings), US: A paradigm shift in obviousness for pharma, biotech: (IP Law360), US: USPTO’s Bruce Kisliuk addresses ACI Pharma/biotech patent claim drafting and prosecution conference: (Patent Docs), US: New bill to provide biotech companies Sarbanes-Oxley relief: (California Biotech Law Blog), US: Biotech and pharma companies spent millions on lobbying in 2007: (Patent… [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
How a team can throw 55 passes in a game, complete 26 and not score is one of the great mysteries of football and points to what must be some poor playcalling by the Bear coaching staff. [read post]