Search for: "Watson v. Stephens"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
Graves, and Judge Stephen A. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 8:39 pm
What do you think, Watson? [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:53 am
Posted by Steve Seelig and Stephen Douglas, Willis Towers Watson, on Wednesday, September 18, 2019 Editor's Note: Steve Seelig is Senior Director, Executive Compensation and Stephen Douglas is Senior Legislative and Regulatory Advisor, Technical Services at Willis Towers Watson. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Watson, who represented former Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini, ex First Minister Alex Salmond, ex Glasgow City Council leader Stephen Purcell, bosses at Rangers Football Club, among others, was suspended from his judicial role as a Sheriff in February of this year by Scotland’s Lord President – Lord Brian Gill. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:06 am
Justice Stephen G. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [5] Citing FTC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [5] Citing FTC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:53 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Stephen C. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
See, e.g., Watson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
See, e.g., Watson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm
" Also a guest post by Stephen Mayeaux, in collaboration with Dante Figueroa, on Spanish Legal Documents (15th to 19th centuries).Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
This was the introduction to 'Sports Personal Injury' published by Sweet and Maxwell in 2002 and written by myself, Dominic Adamson and Stephen Cottrell. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
Stephens, 156 S.W.3d 38, 70 (Tex. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [5] Citing FTC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
Kenney and Stephen G. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The ruling came in Watson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 5:12 am
In a dissent to the Ninth Circuit’s refusal to rehear Washington v. [read post]
