Search for: "Watson v. United States et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
From Donor disclosure: Transparency Matters: Super PACs and Donor Disclosure UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION The Buckeye Institute, Plaintiff, V. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 7:24 am
Joyce, et. al, USDC DC 1:20-cv-02445; Lee, et. al v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Karen Bass et al. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
In a recent NBER report by David Altig et. al., researchers found that by earning an extra $1,000, one in four of the poorest households, regardless of age, gives half to two-thirds of their paycheck to the government in taxes due to marginal net tax rates above 70 percent on earned income.[1] This has significant implications for work incentives and tax credit eligibility if filers combine their incomes and continue working. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 7:10 am
” Given that Trump did the same thing in his presentation of third-party content, he seems to be arguing in the EO that he should not have qualified for Section 230 in 2017. 2) Cockrum et al v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
See, e.g., Watson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
See, e.g., Watson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 2:03 pm
Et Al., v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:00 pm
Tom Watson et al., which respectively considered Swedish and U.K. laws mandating that communications service providers retain customer communications data in bulk for the purpose of preventing and detecting serious crime. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
(Appeal from MD State Court) Anticipation/Obviousness: Google Inc., et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
(Appeal from MD State Court) Anticipation/Obviousness: Google Inc., et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
HOOKS, III, ET AL. v. [read post]
