Search for: "Way v. Lucas*"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
In its second intellectual property appeal (the first being Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39 see my case note "Lucasfilm v Ansoworth The Supreme Court's First IP Appeal" 31 July 2011 IP/IT Update) the United Kingdom Supreme Court had to consider the way in which the requirement of industrial applicability extends to a patent for biological material. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:40 am
However, there was no clear guidance in Hensher (their Lordships canvassed about nine different ways of defining a work of artistic craftsmanship before concluding that they furniture in suit was none of them) and a New Zealand case, Bonz Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 216 (Tipping J) had been approved a couple of times by English courts (Vermaat and Lucasfilm) so it offered a better way forward: and importantly it provided a route to holding… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:15 pm
In the English High Court case of Lucasfilm v Ainsworth, SimmonsCooperAndrew represented the prop designer who produced the Stormtrooper helmets and armor for the 1977 Star Wars film. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 9:52 pm
Prod., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am
Occasionally there are cases that seem to be tailor-made for legal geeks: Naruto v Slater; Lucasfilm v Ainsworth; DC Comics v Towle. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
Top 5 Ways to Help Ensure Your Business has Click-Wrap Agreements that Work: | Handy! [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
The main cases here are Cofemel — Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
The main cases here are Cofemel — Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:39 am
Consider, for example, Lucasfilm’s 2014 opposition against Empire Brewing Company’s “Empire Strikes Bock” beer (TTAB Opposition No. 91218848), and its 2016 suit against “Lightsaber Academy,” a business offering classes and certifications in the way of the Jedi, including martial arts, lightsaber swordplay, and stage combat. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
” A few edited snippets from that exclusive interview follow:“V: What has helped forge your authenticity? [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:17 am
Although 1709 Blog readers did not agree with this proposition, in his judgment in SAS v WPL, Arnold J [at para 27] held that: "In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:20 pm
This is an emotional rainbow brought to life as something new and exciting – the way of the future ….. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:48 am
Instead, [Appellant] argued that the Citation was defective and, therefore, prejudiced him in some way. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:03 am
(v) if those allegations were justiciable, should the court exercise its jurisdiction be exercised in this case? [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm
Then Buffy v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 5:00 pm
In all honesty, when I bring a character to life I am not thinking about the audience, I lift her from the page in a way that is authentic for me … [and that] translates best to the person staring at the screen. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
In Shelley Films Ltd v Rex Features Ltd [1994], a film set was found to meet this criterion. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
[W]hat WPMC are presenting amounts to a package of the [c]oncert [v]ideo with additional material. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
