Search for: "Way v. Superior Court" Results 221 - 240 of 5,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2018, 6:46 am by MBettman
Superior Court, 151 Cal.App.3d 491, 198 Cal.Rptr. 829 (1984) and Cedars-Sinai Med. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Phillip Obbard is a research attorney for the Superior Court in Alameda County. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 4:41 pm
The recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court in De Wolf v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 6:00 am by An Nguyen
A couple of weeks ago, the Superior Court of Justice released an important decision, HCC 77 v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:30 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
That is, the Superior Court decision appears to stand for the proposition that the attorney-client privilege only applies to information given to the attorney by the client and not the other way around. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:54 am by Camille Fischer
Interestingly, another superior court in California has ruled the opposite way, preserving the ability to access data by requiring government agencies to anonymize sensitive information under the CPRA. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:12 pm
  So the trial court lets him go.The Court of Appeal reverses.Nope. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:57 am by Shea Denning
 The defendant was convicted of DWI in district court, and appealed for trial de novo in superior court. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 10:50 am by Mack Sperling
The North Carolina Business Court sent a message to all lawyers practicing in the Business Court last week in Barclift v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443, that class waivers in arbitration agreements should not be enforced if “class arbitration would be a significantly more effective way of vindicating the rights of affected employees than individual arbitration. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 3:27 pm
Superior Court (California Supreme Court 08/30/2007) (4-3 vote) Briefs filed at the US Supreme Court are available at LawMemo and at SCOTUSblog. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 9:56 pm
Superior Court (California Capital Insurance Company) (October 29, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Two) was called upon to determine whether the alleged failure of an insurance company to adequately pay a loss claim was actionable in light of Insurance Code section 790.03 et seq., Moradi-Shalal v. [read post]