Search for: "Way v. Superior Court"
Results 241 - 260
of 5,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2022, 12:00 am
In its ruling, the court accepted the Plaintiff’s argument that the trial court had erred in relying on the case of Rice v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:45 am
The bill would codify portions of last year’s California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 8:17 am
Superior Court (Gonzalez) S139171 (H027976 - Santa Clara County Superior Court - (CV817959) The matter was argued on January 29, 2007, in Sacramento. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:15 am
Superior Court of Santa Clara County (Sandra Gonzalez, Real Party). [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 7:18 pm
., for age discrimination under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Click here to read the opinion: Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v Superior Court (Turcios)). [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
She wrote at paragraphs 35 and 36:[35] Here, the legislation at issue bars access to the superior courts in yet another way ― by imposing hearing fees that prevent some individuals from having their private and public law disputes resolved by the courts of superior jurisdiction ― the… [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm
According to an online article by Zack Needles in the September 5, 2012 Legal Intelligencer, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to address the issue in Barrick v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court, no. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm
I think the case comes out the right way. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
Opinion available at: Savett v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:27 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:19 pm
Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:59 pm
Superior Court (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 872, 880-881.) [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:53 am
Superior Court. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:26 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:00 pm
Superior Court (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 963, 973) and expressly limits its reach to convicted defendants, I concur in the result. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Rivers End Animal Sanctuary and Learning Center, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm
The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision earlier this month in Hall v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 12:04 pm
Mohen v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:06 am
Let's count the ways: (a) In Federal Court, the admissibility of expert testimony is governed by Daubert v. [read post]
