Search for: "Way v. Superior Court" Results 101 - 120 of 5,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2009, 3:36 pm
On September 23, 2009, the Pennsylvania Superior Court handed down a monumental UIM decision in the case of Pusl v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:27 pm
  The answer, by the way, is:  "Yes, there is personal jurisdiction here since the defendant is deliberately 'targeting' a California resident. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:53 pm
  The Court of Appeal holds that policy objective means that California's statute that requires consumers to be warned about things that may cause cancer (via warning labels) is preempted vis-a-vis breakfast cereals in which such cancer-causing chemicals are created by baking, frying, or roasting such grains.Which is a shorthand way of saying that since telling the people the truth may cause them to react in ways we think are bad for them, we'll make sure… [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 6:18 pm
After the California Supreme Court's decision in Sav-On Drug Stores v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
Superior Court (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 828, review granted June 25, 2014, No. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 10:03 am by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Superior Court recently dismissed Jarden LLC’s bid for D&O insurance coverage for an appraisal suit that was not “for” redress of a “wrongful act” – and even if it was, the act couldn’t have occurred before the sale to Jewel Rubbermaid Inc. closed, ending the coverage period, in Jarden LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Mayhew of Stanislaw Superior Court issued his Notice of Hearing on Issues Re Remand (pdf)in the case of Debra Coito v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:15 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
.), and then afterwards (at about 10:15) to get to the BART station I had to walk all the way around City Hall, up Van Ness, past the Bill Graham auditorium. [read post]
29 May 2013, 3:00 pm
  The Court of Appeal affirms, for essentially the same reason.For me, there's such a thing as equity. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 12:45 pm by Howard Knopf
This is a request to the Quebec Superior Court to authorize Copibec to proceed by way of a class action. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
  Without it, the merits perhaps should come out the other way. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:49 pm by Howard Knopf
This is a request to Quebec Superior Court authorize Copibec to proceed by way of a class action. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:56 am by Daniel E. Cummins
According to Superior Court’s Opinion in this Shinal case, the trial court had endeavored to implement what the trial court perceived to the principles enunciated in the case of Cordes v. [read post]