Search for: "Wayne E. Jones"
Results 81 - 90
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
When historians look back at the copyright worlf in 2017 (if our attention spans allow us to have roles such as a 'historian' in the future!) [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
The Relevance and Admissibility of Rezoning and Comparable Sales Occurring After the Date of Taking, When Determining the Value of Condemned Property by Alan T. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(E. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
The petition was filed by noted Jones Day attorney Greg Castanias along with former SG Noel Francisco and BMS (Juno) deputy GC Henry Hadad. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 04123-19 Philips v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03262-19 Bromley v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08073-18 A woman v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 11 Victims of sexual assault (2018), No breach- after investigation 03816-19 Hayden v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2018),… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
Glocks”: Patient-Physician Relationships, Guns and Free SpeechWendy Parmet, Northeastern University School of Law and School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs , Applying the First Amendment to Physician Speech: A Public Health ApproachChristopher Robertson, University of Arizona James E. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
The alleged use of tangible personal property was the county’s decision to hire Caplan and “repeatedly approv[e]/authoriz[e] and qualify[] [Caplan] to have, possess, and use the Glock gun as a firearm. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
The FLSA defines “employee” as “any individual employed by an employer,” 29 U.S.C. 203(e)(1), and “employer” as including “any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee,” 29 U.S.C. 203(d). [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
At issue was whether section 1089(e) waived the government's sovereign immunity for common law battery claims. [read post]
