Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 181 - 200
of 7,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2015, 8:16 am
" If they don't sign the waiver then the case isn't set and the defendant goes back to jail. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:49 am
ADDED: Andrew Sullivan: So once again, we will have the political prospect of the Obama administration simultaneously legally defending the Defense of Marriage Act and Don't Ask, Don't Tell in court, while politically saying they oppose both... [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:41 am
We can't have all Brandeises, Frankfurters and Cardozos.We don't need a mediocrity on the Court, of course. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 3:03 am
That wording came in a motion that Cillo wrote objecting to a second murder defendant joining a legal challenge of Ohio's lethal injection method of capital punishment as being cruel and unusual.Frankly, you'd have to be a lawyer to read the wording in Cillo's motion as any kind of insult, and even some lawyers, including County Prosecutor Dennis Will, don't see anything insulting in it. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
Herrmann also said that MDLs are like a Roach Motel: cases check in, but they don't check out. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
It's not that they don't mean well, but that they share no understanding of the life of those they judge. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 9:30 am
If you don't know where to go, or what to get, know that your local county law library does - because we do this legal stuff all day, day after day, day in and day out so that when you need to know what we know we know where to go and how to get you there. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
The other involves Re:Sound’s Tariff 8, which I've written about, and which the music industry continues to complain about. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 11:43 am
I don't think that's an issue. [read post]
22 May 2010, 4:19 pm
We don't keep our mouths shut till then end and hope that we can tie together all of the pieces of evidence that we snuck into evidence. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 2:10 pm
Also, we don't get want to get sued by the famously litigious* Professor Steinbuch. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:16 am
From the first day in class, students must defend an argument they don't believe or pretend to be a judge whose values they dislike. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:23 am
They don't get trained to throw the elbows in close quarters that those who rose through the ranks of the REGJB did. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:55 pm
Moral of the story: don't talk to jurors about anything during trial, be it the Yankees or any other topic. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:31 pm
And, while we are asking these questions, if the judge in question has a personal problem that intruded on their ability perform their duties, don't the judge or judges who are aware of the situation have an obligation to report that judge to the JQC? [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:09 am
"Of course, we don't know yet how the judge is going to rule, but this order suggests that she is taking the issue seriously," she said. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 12:33 pm
On a different note, the Federalist Society (Motto: "We like Ayn Rand, we just don't read her philosophical writings because they are too complicated") had a meeting/soiree last night (Tuesday), and every wanna be Federal Judge was present. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:10 pm
"He didn't write, 'we don't need a license because of Jonathan Schwartz's blog,' did he? [read post]
BECAUSE WE HAVE THE POWER TO FUCK OUR CLIENTS - The Jefferson Parish Indigent Defender Board Edition
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm
That's offensive, but I don't know that I'd have written about the case if that's all there were here. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:37 am
We can't prove anything about judicial behavior by studying what non-judges do; and we don't claim to have done so. [read post]
