Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1 - 20
of 420
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2013, 5:25 am
Or the judge. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:40 am
So you will tend to believe a cop even if you really try to be neutral and you will say to yourself "something must have been done and badly done or we wouldn't be having a trial.This leads to the biggest joke of all which is that the defendant is not obligated to take the stand and the jury shall not take his/her silence as evidence of guilt. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:49 am
We need more Judge Gleesons. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
On Wednesday, U.S District Court Judge Virginia Phillips issued a permanent injunction against enforcement of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) law. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
I'll always vote to kill - unless the aggravating circumstances don't outweigh mitigation (which, and now mumbling they always do because the guy is dead and the defendant's a killer who, Q.E.D., should be killed.)It's a dance and a farce. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:42 am
We get to laugh, just like we get to laugh at stuff like this: [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 6:58 pm
They do so at the expense of the defendant. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 1:23 pm
In state court here in Florida, judges don't require defendants to appear. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:00 pm
Herald columnist Fred Grimm stomped on Senator Rubio right back, picking up the mantle and defending Judge Will Thomas. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:16 pm
What do we have to give and when do we have to give it? [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:40 am
But the defendants don't care either. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
But I know the judge reads this column, and he knows I am right: We penalize defendants who dare stand on their constitutional rights, making a mockery of justice. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:23 pm
We don't know.The thing is, it's easy to carp from where I sit. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:08 am
'The whole concept of privacy is obsolete,' 'Gathering data about phone calls doesn't raise serious privacy concerns,' 'Surveillance is unobjectionable if it's been going on for many years,' 'We don't have to worry about the 4th Amendment as long as a judge is willing to rubber-stamp the government's actions without any adversarial process,' etc." [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 7:38 pm
While there is no requirement that a defendant ever prove anything at trial, don't kid yourself. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:42 pm
But you don't pay him. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:49 pm
But sometimes we don't. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:30 am
As one friend wrote on his Facebook wall, if you had a favorite character in GoT, maybe now you don't. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
Today, we continue with the court’s analysis and conclusion. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 10:03 am
Simpson" trial, although we don't know yet if it will have a similar outcome. [read post]
