Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 41 - 60
of 420
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2014, 7:44 am
I'm not reading the whole "Whole Woman" book, and I don't know how much it defends the other culture's genital cuttings as opposed to challenging us to judge the culture we don't know with the same degree of harshness or sympathy that we use in judging the culture we do know. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 11:30 pm
A couple of rules to live by: You don't tug on superman's cape; you don't spit into the wind; and when the 3rd DCA tells you TWICE not to sentence a defendant as a Violent Career Criminal, you better damn well listen. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 6:39 pm
And too easily favoring the defendant in civil cases. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:10 pm
Maybe one of defendant's machines! [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 1:54 pm
Exactly as predicted.I know we don't like malicious prosecution cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm
If we think the criminal trial system currently doesn't work that way-- that juries take what the prosecutors say at face value even if the defense attorney vigorously disagrees and the judge tells them that both sides are advocates-- we have much bigger problems. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
If not, the judge or jury could ignore it. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:28 pm
The Judge Responds The judge said that, in cases like this, communications between defendants and potential members of a class action generally should not be restricted. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:18 am
"I reviewed the video on approximately ten occasions and cannot conclude from the video that the defendant's vehicle actually left the roadway," Judge Wicks found. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
In the same vein, sometimes a defendant sued in a Tennessee state court can, as we lawyers say, "remove" the case (have it transferred) to a Tennessee federal court. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:17 pm
My personal take is that we don't necessarily view those cases as "wrong" given the then-prevailing jurisprudence (putting to one side Dred Scott). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
We disagree. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:30 am
Because cops sometimes lie and we don't always know the reasons motivating them. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 7:03 am
So until we break that cycle, then I think the cost is incalculable." [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:29 am
We don't know but it certainly would be interesting to find out. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
The message we don't want to hear is that if you hit and kill someone, and admit to it, you get away with it." [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
We advance case expenses - sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars in a single case - and don't get it back unless we win. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
And if it did, I don't think it would be too bad for Microsoft. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 8:32 pm
Image of Judge Christen from http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7229/7337074222_6c965a98d4_z.jpgSteven Kalar, Federal Public Defender. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
Don't break the law. [read post]
