Search for: "Wear v. Ford Motor Company" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2020, 1:35 pm by lisiadmin
Ford Motor Company alleges that: Certain 2005-2019 Ford F-250 and F-350 Super Duty pickup trucks can experience a death wobble caused by defects in their suspension and/or steering systems. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:00 pm by Joe Price
  Defendants and insurance companies have fought the law without success since it passed including the leading case of Guadio v Ford Motor Company a case out of Pike County decided by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in 2009. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:00 pm by Joe Price
  Defendants and insurance companies have fought the law without success since it passed including the leading case of Guadio v Ford Motor Company a case out of Pike County decided by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in 2009. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 4:19 am
Ford Motor Company, the Pennsylvania Superior Court denied a request to hear additional arguments regarding a defendant's right to introduce evidence concerning seat belt usage, or the lack thereof, in products liability cases involving questions about an automobile's crashworthiness.This Order effectively upholds the Superior Court's 2-1 decision, found at ruling that the trial court should not have allowed any reference to the plaintiff's… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 4:55 pm
Ford Motor Company, 2009 Pa.Super. 102 (June 1, 2009)(Fitzgerald, J., concurring and dissenting in part). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:13 pm
The effect of the description was that the officers should look for some sort of brown or maroon automobile manufactured by the Ford Motor Company driven by a white male who might be wearing a baseball cap. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:55 am by James Innocent
If a company creates a product and it fulfills its function for years and years before wearing down and breaking, should it still be considered faulty? [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 1:55 pm by Shea Denning
Super. 2005) (granting State’s motion to introduce EDR data based on testimony from expert in accident reconstruction and EDR devices who had conducted crash tests and worked with automotive engineers); Safka, 95 A.3d 304 (trial court did not err by admitting EDR testimony from retired electrical engineer employed by Ford Motor Company for 33 years). [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:04 am by Robin Shea
I don’t always agree with the EEOC (see entry on Ford Motor Company, below), but I love it when government agencies try to help employers to comply with the law. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:31 am by John Elwood
  Two-time relist Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:27 am by Brian A. Comer
Ford Motor Co., which created the “feasible design” standard: In cases that alleged a company created a defective product, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the company could feasibly have manufactured a safer product.Had the case been overturned, the plaintiff would only have to prove that the product did not live up to consumer expectations.Comer said that the issue is one that deserves another look, but should be considered as a separate issue and… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IPBiz),Eco-patent commons meets open innovation: (Securing Innovation),Settle the patent infringement case by selling your company? [read post]