Search for: "Webster v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 985
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
Another significant legal battle involving murals and VARA unfolded in the case of Kerson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 8:32 am by Alan Brackett
In 2020, the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (“WCAB”) in Atkins v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
Funny ones really. 00:35:19 gretchen desutter: A favorite scene with Monica was a Twins v Yankees game. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 31 October 2023 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Webster v HMRC. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
United States Patrick Reed’s $750m (£618m) defamation lawsuits against golf reporters and media outlets has been dismissed by a federal judge in Florida. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Collins Rice J made an order following a pre-trial review in the data protection case of Webster v HMRC. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
 The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to answer that question in Corner Post v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 12:11 pm by Unknown
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; 638 Contract) United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Commerce Clause, in Nation and States,” at the U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]