Search for: "Weeks v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 2,347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 27 and 28 February 2023, Nicklin J heard applications in the case of CR and others v Paymaster (1836) Limited trading as Equiniti. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Nedim Malovic
Grimaldi) whereby the right to protect a registered trade mark (a protection given in the USA law essentially by the Lanham Act), under some circumstances, cannot be enforced to detriment of “the right of others to express themselves freely in their own artistic work” (from the Rogers v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:54 pm by Kalvis Golde
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Chevron USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:00 pm by A. Robert Quirk, Muhammad U. Faridi
  Not if it fails to provide objective criteria for a court to enforce material terms, according to the Albany County Commercial Division’s decision in Media Logic USA, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:20 pm by David Oscar Markus
In the ordinary course, the matter then wound its way to the Fourth District Court of Appeal which, less than six weeks ago, decided Guzman v. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
IJ Senior Attorney Robert Everett Johnson has more at USA Today. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:15 pm by JP Zanders
The Ninth Review Conference will start in two weeks (28 November – 16 December). [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
District court: Point of fact, the act violates Miss USA's freedom of association rights. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm by James Kwong
This week, we bring to you some IPKat Team News as well as many upcoming events and opportunities. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 8:31 am by OxFirst
Last week, Professor Adam Jaffe (Brandeis University, USA & Motu Economic and Policy Research, New Zealand) joined for a presentation assessing the implications on the patent system from the rise of inventions created by AI. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:47 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” As best I can tell, there are now exactly seven appeals court decisions from three of the four Departments of the Appellate Division explicitly adopting this rule of construction of contract indemnification provisions to cover intra-party disputes unless otherwise specified in the agreement: In re Part 60 RMBS Put – Back Litig.WSA Group, PE., PC v DKI Eng’g & Consulting USA PC (178 AD3d 1320 [3d Dept 2019])Crown Wisteria, Inc. v Cibani (178… [read post]