Search for: "Weinberg v Sultan"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am
The claims against Sultan and the Asher defendants are barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767 [1st Dept 2016] [affirming, inter alia, summary dismissal of legal malpractice claims]). [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am
Glassman v Weinberg 2017 NY Slip Op 06885 Decided on October 3, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department is a prime example. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s cause of action for “Concealment and Failure to Self Report” is not viable because “there is no private right of action against an attorney or law firm for violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility or disciplinary rules” (Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767, 769 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s cause of action for “Concealment and Failure to Self Report” is not viable because “there is no private right of action against an attorney or law firm for violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility or disciplinary rules” (Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767, 769 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am
Moreover, “‘there is no private right of action against an attorney or law firm for violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility or disciplinary rules'” (Karimian v Karlin, 173 AD3d 614, 616, quoting Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767, 769; see DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814). [read post]
