Search for: "Weir v. Weir" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal DirecTV Says It Will Sever Ties with Far-Right Network One America News MSN – Timothy Bella (Washington Post) | Published: 1/15/2022 DirecTV announced it will sever ties with One America News (OAN) after this year, pulling the conservative news channel from millions of homes. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
  Pix Credit HERENorges Bank announced its decision to revoke the exclusion of Precious Shipping PCL from the Fund. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  In Steel v United Kingdom ((2005) 41 EHRR 22) the Court found violations of Article 6 and Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In that action, which is still pending, plaintiffs were initially represented by attorney Weir of the Sacks firm. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
” In Weir v Weir, (1986) 1 RFL (3d) 438 (BCSC), the court held that dependence arising from a “poor job market” qualified adult children for support, a conclusion that was expanded in Bruehler v Bruehler, (1985) 49 RFL (2d) 44 (BCCA) to include “a state of [economic] depression in a province. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
The Opponent however argued that this did not automatically mean that the Applicant owns the goodwill attached to all trademarks containing “HARVARD”, claiming that it owned goodwill attached to “HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE” as a result of long use.The Applicant countered by arguing that it owned all goodwill attached to “HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE” because each Harvard Club is/was a trademark licensee of the Applicant, and thus the goodwill generated in connection… [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:48 am
Under Singapore law, bad faith embraces— ...not only actual dishonesty but also dealings which would be considered as commercially unacceptable by reasonable and experienced persons in a particular trade, even though such dealings may otherwise involve no breach of any duty, obligation, prohibition or requirement that is legally binding upon the registrant of the trade mark (Weir Warman Ltd v Research & Development Pty Ltd [2007] 2 SLR (R) 1073). [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Weir-Jones Technical Services Incorporated v Purolator Courier Ltd, 2019 ABCA 49 [30] Addressing the “standard of proof” is not therefore a stand-alone test for whether summary judgment is possible or appropriate. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:00 am by Marika R. Strobl
On February 6, 2019, the Alberta Court of Appeal delivered its much anticipated decision in Weir-Jones Technical Services Incorporated v Purolator Courier Ltd, 2019 ABCA 49 (Weir-Jones). [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 5:21 pm
Madam Justice Bennett, in Valentyne Estate v. [read post]