Search for: "Weisman, Appeal of" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
He appealed, setting up yesterday's decision.Additional web pages: InSync Communication, Drug Expert Witness. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:57 am by Nabiha Syed
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit invalidating an Arizona law which would require residents to provide proof of citizenship before they may register to vote. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:51 am
He had a unique appeal with jurors because he always presented reasonable alternatives to the prosecution case. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm by Carl Esbeck
  In Weisman, Justice Kennedy for the Court noted its false allure. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Paralegal Mentor
Ireland, 11th District Court of Appeals Waverly Christina C. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Appeals Court Upholds ‘Obstruction’ Charge Used Against Hundreds of Jan. 6 Rioters, for Now ABC News – Ryan Reilly | Published: 4/7/2023 A federal appeals court panel affirmed the government’s use of an obstruction charge used against hundreds of defendants arrested in connection with the attack on the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:51 am by Just Security
Circosta (Mar. 4, 2022) Emergency Motion for Stay of Injunction Pending Appeal (Mar. 9, 2022)  Order Granting Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Mar. 10, 2022)  Backgrounder: Jonathan Weisman, Judge Blocks Effort to Disqualify Cawthorn from Ballot as ‘Insurrectionist’, New York Times (Mar. 4, 2022)   Constitutional Accountability Center Amicus Brief (Mar. 11, 2022) Plaintiff’s Response to Motion to Stay (Mar. 14, 2022)  North Carolina GOP… [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 8:42 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
In re Marriage of Zimmerman (April 8, 2010; as modified April 23, 2010) California Court of Appeal 2 Civil B211381 (Div 5) 183 Cal.App.4th 900, __ Cal.Rptr.3d __, 2010 WL 1382340, 2010 FA 1435, per Mosk, J (Armstrong, Acting PJ and Weisman, J, concurring). [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
Weisman and Santa Fe Independent School District v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:00 am by Mary Dwyer
Weisman and Santa Fe Independent School District v. [read post]