Search for: "Wellington v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
” The case, Solid 21 Inc. v Hublot of America, et al. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Moreham, Victoria University of Wellington – Faculty of Law. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
“The State cannot use criminal defamation cases to throttle democracy,” he observed. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:05 am by Eugene Volokh
The council contended that “the site is not suitable for the proposed synagogue use as the Preliminary Threat and Risk Analysis relied on by the Applicant raises concerns as to the safety and security of future users of the Synagogue, nearby residents, motorists and pedestrians in Wellington Street,” and yesterday’s court decision (Friends of Refugees of Eastern Europe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:14 am by Giles Peaker
And then In Gater and others v Wellington Real Estate Limited (2014) UKUT 561 (LC) (“Gater”) the Tribunal had to consider an obligation to pay: “a due and fair proportion of the Service Cost (such proportion to be determined by the Landlord or its surveyor (in each case acting reasonably)” There is no stipulation in that clause that the landlord’s determination was to be final and binding. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:01 am by Phil Dixon
This culminated in the famous Terry v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
According to the complaint, in December 2010 Urzhumtsev issued a resolution which “defamed Sergei Magnitsky by accusing him post-mortem of embezzling 5.4 billion roubles from the state budget. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  He dismissed the claim for state immunity brought by the former King of Spain. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]