Search for: "Wells et al. v. United States et al" Results 1 - 20 of 2,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 2:48 pm by The Complex Litigator
On the consumer litigation front, today the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Ticketmaster, et al. v. [read post]
By: Sofia Ellington On January 18th, 2024, The Washington Supreme Court came to the University of Washington School of Law to hear oral arguments in the case of Greenberg, et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
The doctors’ compliance with these repeated procedures seems a little suspect as well. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 10:26 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Sega of America Inc et al United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaCase No. [read post]
In both Gonzalez and Taamneh, the Solicitor General will also be arguing on behalf of the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 1:29 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the June 27, 2012 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
Thursday we began a series on the Second Circuit of Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:25 am by help@sandbergphoenix.com
On February 22, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:51 pm by Michael Rosenblat
United States et al. ex rel Escobar et al., found that a defendant could be liable for violating the False Claims Act under a theory of implied false certification. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:51 pm by Michael Rosenblat
United States et al. ex rel Escobar et al., found that a defendant could be liable for violating the False Claims Act under a theory of implied false certification. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:51 pm by Michael Rosenblat
United States et al. ex rel Escobar et al., found that a defendant could be liable for violating the False Claims Act under a theory of implied false certification. [read post]