Search for: "Wells v Jalloh"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2017, 7:52 pm
With this draft convention, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
The fullest rationale offered for it is stated in this vague formulation: “The Commission took this decision in view of the nature of the crime of aggression, which would require national courts to determine the existence of a prior act of aggression by the foreign State, as well as the special political dimension of this type of crime, given that it constitutes a ‘crime of leaders. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:43 pm
We then move from international criminal courts to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights with Lisl Brunner’s piece which explores the recent Gelman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
Indeed, as the Court found in Jalloh, cited above, § 105, admitting evidence obtained by torture would only serve to legitimate indirectly the sort of morally reprehensible conduct which the authors of Article 3 of the Convention sought to proscribe. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:05 am
Dennis, as well as me. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
