Search for: "Wells v. Barile" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In REVERSING Niagara County Supreme's denial of Geico's summary judgment motion, the Fourth Department held: "It is well established that a notice of cancellation is ineffective unless in strict compliance with the requirements of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 (1) (a)" (Barile v Kavanaugh, 67 NY2d 392, 399), and plaintiff met its initial burden by demonstrating its strict compliance with the statute, i.e., plaintiff demonstrated that it… [read post]