Search for: "Wells v. Burger King Corp." Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2021, 6:02 am by Josh Blackman
Dworkin, 601 F. 3d 693, 708–709 (CA7 2010)(collecting cases); see also Burger King, 471 U. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel
Almost two decades after releasing its veggie burger, Burger King has begun marketing one such plant-based product: Impossible Foods’ Impossible Burger. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
  According to the majority, the substantial nexus requirement is closely related to the due process minimum contacts requirement and that it is well settled that a business need not have a physical presence to satisfy the due process requirement. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:16 pm by Gideon Alper
The same employers usually have non-discrimination policies as well. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:38 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  MAJ Rosenblatt makes an outstanding case that the UCMJ doesn’t work as intended in a deployed environment, advancing the memorable “Burger King Theory” to help make his case. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
They operate the restaurants under their own names and other brand names including Burger King, Starbucks, Chili’s, Quizno’s, California Pizza Kitchen, KFC, and Pizza Hut. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
The Competition Cases          Whole Foods at least involved issues on which reasonable minds could disagree, and the able, well-regarded Democratic appointee who presided at trial agreed with Judge Kavanaugh on the outcome. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm by Narine Bagdassarian
Copyright Act, as well as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”). [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
General Motors Corp 6th Affirms Pro Se $120,000 Employment Discrimination VerdictMadden v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.(2000), Justice Scalia, although well-known for his textualism and opposition to reliance on legislative history, signed on to a Supreme Court majority opinion the featured extensive analysis of legislative history. [read post]