Search for: "Wells v. CIR" Results 1 - 20 of 14,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2017, 9:58 pm by Patent Docs
The decision is consistent with recent trends at the Court, reviewing both district court obviousness determinations as well as those by the PTAB at the USPTO (see "Securus Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:38 pm
Hodges, 515 F.2d 650, 653 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
Police Dep't, 380 F.3d 751, 760 (3d Cir.2004) (two months is not unusually suggestive); LeBoon v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:13 pm by Patent Docs
In light of the Office's promulgation of Guidance to the examining corps as well as PTAB judges of the "increased flexibility" in obviousness determinations mandated by the Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:02 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Arnell Chevrolet-Geo, Inc., 265 F.3d 638, 648-49 (7th Cir.2001); but it did so citing a prior case, Gavoni v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:12 pm
 Judge Gould's dissent says that he "regrets" that he's constrained to disagree, and thinks that especially for entities like Wells Fargo -- a traditional California entity and one with its principal place of business here -- it's silly to say they're not "located" here.But Judge McKeown gets Judge Bybee's vote. [read post]