Search for: "Wells v. CIVIL SERVICE COMM." Results 1 - 20 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 2:14 pm
 But I wonder if it's just.Petitioner said that he was wrongfully fired from his civil service position, but he then died while his writ petition was pending in the superior court. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 2:06 pm by Berry Law Firm
After the VA initially denied the claim for service-connection, the Federal Circuit issued an order to hear the Procopio v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
  The Supreme Court begins its opinion by explaining that[a]s recently as ten years ago, it was considered a cutting edge development in civil practice for a court to allow the service of a summons by email. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am by Karl Mihm
The civil cases could certainly do their fair share of damage as well, directly or indirectly. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Wells Fargo Alarm Service, Inc., 39 N.Y.2d 191, 196 (1976).In support of the charges, petitioner relied on the testimony of Mr. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Wells Fargo Alarm Service, Inc., 39 N.Y.2d 191, 196 (1976).In support of the charges, petitioner relied on the testimony of Mr. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
In a dispute implicating the civil barratry statute, then, the trial court would have to address the merits of the voidness claim as an affirmative defense to the legal service provider's fee claim that is exempted from arbitration under the attorney-client contract, but the arbitrator would have to decide the merits of the civil barratry claim that rests on the same facts because the client had agreed to to arbitrate all claims. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
  The recognition of the government misconduct exception in the FOIA context is not sufficiently well-grounded in precedent to deter unsympathetic courts of appeal or the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, we remit the matter to Supreme Court for a determination as to whether it would be unduly burdensome for respondent to comply with petitioner's modified request (see Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 183 AD3d at 733; Matter of New York Comm. for Occupational Safety & Health v Bloomberg, 72 AD3d at 162). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, we remit the matter to Supreme Court for a determination as to whether it would be unduly burdensome for respondent to comply with petitioner's modified request (see Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 183 AD3d at 733; Matter of New York Comm. for Occupational Safety & Health v Bloomberg, 72 AD3d at 162). [read post]