Search for: "Wells v. Dickens" Results 61 - 80 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2013, 10:08 am
It was in his opening statements that he confessed that, while it is a common misconception that he was the first to use the criterion of coolness as a grounds of differentiation in the well known Apple v Samsung judgment of 9 July 2012 (noted by the IPKat here), it simply isn’t true. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:26 am by SHG
Dogs are magic and honest and cute as the dickens. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Howard Knopf
 David Vaver explains this issue very well in his discussion of “Taking a Particle Does Not Infringe” at p. 184-188 of his 2011 book. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:57 am
 Rick Sanders, writing on his law firm's blog, has some interesting insights on ReDigi in the US in "Music Industry v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
It was the best of opinions, it was the worst of opinions…  Well, now you know what it would be like if Charles Dickens had decided to become a lawyer instead of devoting his life to describing human depravity and suffering on a scale I haven’t seen since the last time I went over to the Justice Center. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:11 am by Susan I. Nelson
In footnote 21 of Justice Willett's concurrence to Barbara Williams v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:12 am by Christine Sellers
Yet, in the real world, the legal issues left unaddressed at the end of the book would have likely spawned a multitude of suits, such as the case of Jarndyce v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm by Buce
 I'd count the boost for nationalist solidarity you get from Fluellen in Henry V ("it is out of my prains"). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm by Barry Barnett
You know things probably won't turn out well when the first sentence in a 5-4 U.S. [read post]