Search for: "Wells v. Estelle" Results 41 - 60 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 9:43 pm
Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, and on appeal to the Supreme Court). [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:03 am by Anna Christensen
  For example, in the Supreme Court’s seminal application of the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause to prison conditions, Justice Marshall wrote the majority opinion in Estelle v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:08 am
(hereafter referred to as Looting)Redefining Rape: Sexual violence in the era of Suffrage and Segregation, By Estelle B. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
Again in a lovely vernal day, the Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (TILT), for the 6th time, has brought together researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and civil society at the intersection of law and regulation, technology, and society to share insights, exchange ideas and formulate answers to contemporary challenges related to technological innovation, at the TILTing Perspectives 2019 Conference.Opening speech The conference was very well-attended. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:01 am by Amy Howe
Supreme Court cases that, in its view, lead to the conclusion that Cheever waived his Fifth Amendment privilege when he relied on a mental-state defense:  Estelle v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Robert E. Connolly
This doctrine has become known as the “fugitive disentitlement doctrine” and is now well-established law in the United States. [5] Unfortunately, the doctrine is being applied today not just to defendants who have been convicted and fled, but to foreign based, non-United States citizens who have never been convicted of anything or even set foot in the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:34 am by Roy Black
Surely, the fear that one’s own county would respond to a not guilty verdict by erupting into violence is as highly “impermissible [a] factor,” Estelle v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Making reveals Stevens’s commitment to access to the courts decades prior to Twombly in his dissent in Estelle v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am by Eoin Daly
Thish was evident in the Byrne v Minister for Finance case, where the Supreme Court eschewed any excessively literalist approach to the existing article 35.5, privileging the purpose and value of the literal rule. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am by Eoin Daly
 Although it was held in Byrne v Minister for Finance that article 35.5 does not prevent the imposition of a generally applicable income tax on judicial salaries, the previous Government concluded, in 2009, that it precluded the imposition on judges not only of the public sector pay cuts, but also, the pension levy. [read post]