Search for: "Wells v. Lloyd IV" Results 61 - 75 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2011, 10:20 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Many advisers who are not well-versed in copyright law may not be aware of this right. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session IV (Intermediaries and Secondary Liability) Discussion of Blizzard case: the infringement theory was that the RAM copy of a user’s game was unauthorized because, though the user was an authorized user, the particular use was unauthorized. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am by charonqc
For example, paragraph 87(iv) of the first open judgment is itself revealing about the detention of Mr Mohamed and the involvement of our intelligence services with him. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
DIANNA ROSA; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-07-00639-CV, 240 SW3d 565, 12-07-07)08-0139 MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, NATIONAL STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, AND MARYLAND LLOYDS v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:37 pm
  In that case, Lloyd's notes that exclusions must be well worded and enforceable to be effective. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
L.J.Dragovic, Office of the Medical Examiner,Oakland County, Michigan (Aug. 15, 2006)..........34Autopsy Report for Lloyd LaFevers, Dr. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Last month we examined some pre-Roman beginnings of modern admiralty doctrine, starting from pre-history through the Greek city states. [read post]
8 Mar 2006, 8:19 am
Suckers for punishment: Qualtex go down in CAThe IPKat has just learned, via All England Direct, that the Court of Appeal has dismissed what he assumed was always going to be a hopeless appeal in Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 166 (Tuckey, Jacob and Lloyd LJJ).Dyson, a company that designed and made vacuum cleaners, sued Qualtex for infringing its unregistered design right after Qualtex started making spare parts for Dyson cleaners. [read post]