Search for: "Wells v. McKenzie" Results 1 - 20 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by webmaster
On June 16, 2011, Central District Judge Gary Allen Feess granted the plaintiffs’ certification motion in McKenzie v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by webmaster
On June 16, 2011, Central District Judge Gary Allen Feess granted the plaintiffs’ certification motion in McKenzie v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:55 am by Legal Beagle
A SIXTEEN YEAR BATTLE in Scotland’s courts between a struggling pensioner, Andrew McNamara and the might & influence of Edinburgh law firm Tods Murray, may well have been considerably shortened if reforms implemented only a few days ago in Scotland’s courts, granting McKenzie Friends a right of audience had come much earlier, reports Catherine Simpson in the Herald newspaper. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:21 am by James Eckert
In People v McKenzie (#133 decided 6/26/12) the Court held that, in determining whether to charge Extreme Emotional Disturbance in a homicide trial, "the relevant inquiry was whether the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, presented a triable question, we believe that the issue of the reasonableness of defendant's explanation should have been put to the jury. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:22 am by emagraken
McKenzie) the Plaintiff settled his ICBC claim after litigation was well underway for specified damages plus “costs payable“. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:51 am by Colter Paulson
In December, the Sixth Circuit, in Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, P.C. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
  In fact, it may well have been the reason why the board was changed from six directors to five. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
" Focusing as well on personal-private v public use in various copyright and related statues, we find a similar form of exception for certain defined activities with respect to a copyright work, which are for "private and/or personal" use. [read post]
The SEC’s complaint charges Vale with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as Sections 13(a) of the Exchange Act.[13] On May 23, 2022, the SEC announced the settlement of charges against BNY Mellon Investment Adviser, Inc. [read post]