Search for: "Wells v. Roper"
Results 61 - 80
of 199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Well, two out of three ain’t bad. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Roper, 14-6873, a capital case that asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
The execution of a person who can show that he is innocent comes perilously close to simple murder.Herrera v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Roper v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:50 am
Like the school district lines in Milliken v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:56 pm
Roper, 116 Ill. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:49 am
Roper v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
And recent opinions, especially Roper v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
In concluding that the Act was content-neutral, the district court relied heavily on this Court’s decision in Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:57 am
Kennedy referred in Roper v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
(See Ford v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 10:55 am
In relying on Roper v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 1:45 pm
Roper and United States Parole Comm'n v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am
Virginia) and those who were under 18 at the time of their crime (Roper v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:14 am
As Supreme Court of Canada Justice Iacobucci wrote, in dissent, in the case of R. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:14 am
As Supreme Court of Canada Justice Iacobucci wrote, in dissent, in the case of R. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:37 am
Virginia, finding the execution of the mentally ill unconstitutional; Roper v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 11:02 pm
The task for the court then is to assess whether the employee’s continued employment was consistent with the new clauses applying or, in the words of the test laid down in the leading case of Solectron Scotland ltd v Roper and Ors [2004] IRLR 4 “Is the employee’s conduct, by continuing to work, only referable to his having accepted the new terms imposed by the employer? [read post]
