Search for: "Wells v. Smith*"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:19 am
In December, Smith asked for 21 days between the Court granting cert and oral argument (per the U.S. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am
A short excerpt from today's long decision by Judge Trevor McFadden (D.D.C.) in Newman v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Trump concedes, as he must (Br. at 24-25), that the President is an “officer” for purposes of the Constitution.[1] After all, the Constitution refers to the President’s “office” or to the “Office of the President” almost two dozen times.[2] He insists, however, that the qualifying phrase “of the United States” in Section 3 serves to exclude the President, as well as the Vice-President, Senators and House… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm
From Shen v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court as well. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[10] The June 1, 1972 Report of the Advisory Committee on Enforcement Policies and Practices—now commonly referred to as the Wells Report—included a lengthy discussion about the settlement of Commission enforcement actions, and made several recommendations related to the settlement process.[11] The Commission had decades of experience settling cases, through both settlements on a no-admit/no-deny basis and settlements allowing defendants to deny… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:36 am
While no recorded dissent or explanation was given by the Supreme Court, the 11th Circuit Court cited the Supreme Court opinion in Glossip v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am
Julie Tsirkin, Monica Alba, Frank Thorp V and Rebecca Kaplan report for NBC News. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
And the Court just granted cert in another equity case, Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
In Martin v. [read post]
