Search for: "Wells v. Wynn" Results 21 - 40 of 169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 11:46 am
It's bad enough to have to fight the other side; to have to fight off lawyers on your own side as well makes it truly a hassle.Second, on the merits, I don't disagree with Judge Bea's holding that there's no appellate jurisdiction here or his refusal to grant extraordinary mandamus relief. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir. 1981) (preference of clients in South America for dealing with males cannot make sex into a bona fide qualification); Diaz v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir. 1981) (preference of clients in South America for dealing with males cannot make sex into a bona fide qualification); Diaz v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
Greene), which culminated in a thoughtful written ruling as well. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And as with sealing, pseudonymity is presumptively forbidden by the First Amendment as well as the common law. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 6:39 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Friday morning read: The Supreme Court isn’t well. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Wynne, the Supreme Court struck down a Maryland tax provision on DCC grounds as violating "internal consistency. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Wynne & Jaffe, 599 F. 2d 707, 712–13 (5th Cir. 1979); Mateer v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Wynne & Jaffe, 599 F. 2d 707, 712–13 (5th Cir. 1979); Mateer v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
And if the case is seen as run-of-the-mill within its category, then allowing pseudonymity would imply that other cases in the category should be pseudonymized as well. [read post]