Search for: "Wesley v. Mobil Oil Corp."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2018, 6:45 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 7 N.Y.3d 434, 446, 857 N.E.2d 1114 (2006), citing People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 1:59 pm
ExxonMobil Corp. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
The Frye test emphasizes "'counting scientists' votes," rather than verifying the soundness of a scientific conclusion (Parker v Mobil Oil Corp., 7 NY3d 434, 447 [2006]). [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
After that hearing, at which scientific literature was introduced and doctors for both the planitiffs and defendants testified, Justice Mayer ruled that plaintiffs would not be allowed to offer expert testimony at trial in support of their MCS claims:In New York, evidence based on novel scientific theories or techniques is considered admissible only upon a showing of general acceptance within the relevant scientific community (People v Carrieri, 49 AD3d 660, 854 NYS2d 427 [2d Dept 2008];… [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 11:59 am
ExxonMobil Corp. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 11:59 am
ExxonMobil Corp. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
Krass and Wesley Kelman. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
Krass and Wesley Kelman. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 7 NY3d 434, 446-47 (2006), quoting People v. [read post]
