Search for: "West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection" Results 21 - 40 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2023, 1:00 am
COMPANY ALSO AGREES TO RESTORE ALL IMPACTED WATERSWaco Oil & Gas Co has reached a settlement with the United States Justice Department and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, to resolve allegations that it violated the Clean Water Act and West Virginia law for discharging “dredged or fill material into waters … in Braxton County, West Virginia. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:58 pm by David Wagner
It also requires the disclosure of fracking additives to the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:24 am by Rosa Schechter
Last week, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) okayed a big jump in the valuation of a tract of land held by the Highlands Ranch Mitigation Bank. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Ayo Aladesanmi
The restructuring within the agency comes on the heels of West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm by WIMS
The district court denied OVEC's motion for summary judgment, granted summary judgment in favor of the Secretary and Intervenors-Appellees West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) and West Virginia Coal Association (WVCA) (collectively Intervenors), and entered a final judgment in favor of the Secretary and Intervenors. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:11 am by Ann Neil Cosby
Virginia’s Phase II Watershed Improvement Plan was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on March 30, 2012, as discussed here and here. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 10:57 am by David Wagner
The legislation also increased the presumption of contamination as a result of water wells to a distance of 500 feet, and would require the disclosure of fracking additives to the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am by Liskow & Lewis
The United States and the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection alleged that the company impounded streams and discharged dirt, sand, rocks and other materials into streams and wetlands without permits to construct well pads, pipeline stream crossings, surface impoundments, and other structures relating to natural gas extraction. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:54 am by Richard Frank
” The states of West Virginia, Ohio and Indiana–joined by energy companies and industry trade groups–promptly sued EPA in the D.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:32 am by WIMS
<> A full month after West Virginia spill, many questions linger … along with the chemical's distinctive odor - By Richard Denison, Ph.D., is a Senior Scientist with EDF. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am by WIMS
Environmental Protection Agency today issued updated draft advice on. . . [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:08 pm
From New England to New Mexico, and the Pacific Northwest to Florida, with a dose of Texas an West Virginia too, the Endangered Species Act made news nationwide this week. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
A new report shows that states ignore the risks of sometimes hazardous oil and gas waste despite EPA's exemption of such waste from federal oversight based on "adequate" state management -- Wasting Away: Four states' failure to manage oil and gas waste in the Marcellus and Utica Shale examines how Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia and New York neither regulate oil and gas development wastes as hazardous, nor can assure the… [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
July 28, 2015) — A unanimous DC Circuit granted several challenges, invalidating the 2014 SO2 emissions budgets imposed on Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina and Texas, and the 2014 ozone-season NOx budgets for Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 9:36 am by Guest Author
In the West Virginia litigation itself,  the Trump Administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in its repeal of the Clean Power Plan (CPP) through its replacement with the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, argued that the CPP was unlawful, in part, because it “must be supported by a clear statement from Congress. [read post]