Search for: "West v. American Airlines, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (held that plaintiffs were not disabled under the ADA because corrective mitigating  measures must be taken into account when determining if someone is impaired) and in Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (held that plaintiffs were not disabled under the ADA because corrective mitigating  measures must be taken into account when determining if someone is impaired) and in Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:04 am by Sheppard Mullin
Driscoll-Chippendale (202) 469-4921 JDriscoll-Chippendale@sheppardmullin.com  [1] The following airlines were named as defendants in plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint: Air Canada, Alaska Airlines, Alaska AirGroup, Inc., ATA Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., America West Airlines, Inc., Continental Airlines Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Hawaiian… [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:30 am by PaulKostro
” (citing Atlantic Northern Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:47 am
Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 384 (1992) (citation omitted), and that Congress is presumed to legislate with knowledge of then existing law. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
The paper sets out an argument that apportionment is a 20th century reform of American tort law, from the common law’s “all or nothing” approach.[1] I respectfully disagree with Professor Green’s assessment. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm by Xiaomin (Samantha) Hu
By the time of the American Revolution, anti-suit injunctions were viewed with circumspection. [read post]