Search for: "West v. Genuine Parts Company" Results 1 - 20 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
But there is nothing stronger than the determination of millions of people who, by their culture, religion, traditions, and language, consider themselves part of Russia, whose ancestors lived in a single country for centuries. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in passing off… [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am by Nicholas Mosvick
The Court’s March 1937 decision in West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
Raymond Niro, who had a towering influence over the practice of patent litigation.* Genuine use of three dimensional EU trade marks - heated arguments over ovensMark Schweizer summarises the CJEU appeal on a 3D oven mark (EUTM), which reminds everybody that registering a mark is only part of the game – you also need to enforce your mark, or you risk losing it. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:06 am by Jacobs Paul
The California Supreme Court case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Shac engaged CallFire, a third-party mobile marketing company, to provide a web-based platform (here, EXTexting.com) for sending promotional text messages to its customers. . . . [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Ten of the cases remain pending.VERMONT TIGHTENS RULES ON GIFTS FROM DEVICE, DRUG COMPANIES, 5 No. 3 West's Medical Malpractice Law Report 3, West's Medical Malpractice Law Report July 2, 2009Vermont Gov. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The one internet giant everyone wanted to hear from, Twitter, had decided not to take an active part in the discussion panels. [read post]