Search for: "West v. Kansas Natural Gas Co"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Grace & Co. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Washington Beef is owned by AgriBeef Co., a privately-held company in Boise, Idaho. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– Susan Montoya Bryan, The Associated Press, April 27, 2010 The Bureau of Land Management and conservation groups have settled an eight-year dispute over a management plan for nearly 10,000 natural gas wells in the San Juan Basin of northwestern New Mexico. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
“It’s affecting waters around the world, and it’s particularly stark in the waters off the West Coast. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
According to a consent agreement and final order filed Feb. 23 in Kansas City, Kan., several violations of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) were noted during a February 2007 inspection of the UPS facility at 14650 West Santa Fe Trail Drive in Lenexa. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
According to a consent agreement and final order filed today in Kansas City, Kan., several violations of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) were noted during a February 2007 inspection of the UPS facility at 14650 West Santa Fe Trail Drive, in Lenexa. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Mary’s, Kansas. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Seth Borenstein, The Associated Press, December 6, 2009 With the world losing the battle against global warming so far, experts are warning that humans need to follow nature’s example: Adapt or die. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Id. at 230 (FDA "d[id] not include" Plaintiffs' claimed requirement); 230 (Plaintiffs' claim "at best a tenuous assertion and, at worst, an outright mischaracterization of the record"); 230 ("the record flatly contradicts plaintiffs' position"); 231 (describing "specious nature of plaintiffs' claim"); 231-32 (claims based upon "inapplicable" materials). [read post]
